<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 4th Edition Release</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scorm.com/blog/2009/05/4th-edition-followup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scorm.com/blog/2009/05/4th-edition-followup/</link>
	<description>We make SCORM easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:50:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Martin</title>
		<link>http://scorm.com/blog/2009/05/4th-edition-followup/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scorm.com/?p=3664#comment-429</guid>
		<description>Tony.

Fair question.  We&#039;re &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; likely to release a beta to TestTrack for testing.  Would that be sufficient for your purposes?  Or are you a SCORM Engine customer who&#039;d really like to install a few new things early?  The question from my perspective is, &quot;Would customers see enough benefit in 2009.1 absent SCORM 2004 4th Edition to merit a release cycle on our part &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; on their part?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony.</p>
<p>Fair question.  We&#8217;re <em>very</em> likely to release a beta to TestTrack for testing.  Would that be sufficient for your purposes?  Or are you a SCORM Engine customer who&#8217;d really like to install a few new things early?  The question from my perspective is, &#8220;Would customers see enough benefit in 2009.1 absent SCORM 2004 4th Edition to merit a release cycle on our part <em>and</em> on their part?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Lin</title>
		<link>http://scorm.com/blog/2009/05/4th-edition-followup/comment-page-1/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Lin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scorm.com/?p=3664#comment-428</guid>
		<description>Would you consider releasing 2009.1 ASAP for those interested and making 2009.2 the certified release in the event 2009.1 doesn&#039;t pass? Or maybe 2009.1 beta would be a better moniker, to emphasize the fact that it hasn&#039;t finished certification. In any event, there must be some people out there interested in using some of the new features who would rather not wait that long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you consider releasing 2009.1 ASAP for those interested and making 2009.2 the certified release in the event 2009.1 doesn&#8217;t pass? Or maybe 2009.1 beta would be a better moniker, to emphasize the fact that it hasn&#8217;t finished certification. In any event, there must be some people out there interested in using some of the new features who would rather not wait that long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

